| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
01/04/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
GRAHMANN, K.; RUBIO, V.; PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.; QUINCKE, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
KATHRIN GRAHMANN, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Resource-Efficient Cropping Systems, Research Area . Land Use and Governance, Müncheberg, Germany.; VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO PEREZ-BIDEGAIN, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay.; JUAN ANDRES QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Soil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system. MenosAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and v... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
INTENSIFICATION INDEX; LONG-TERM EXPERIMENT; RUNOFF; RUSLE; SEDIMENTS; SOIL DEDRADATION; SOIL DEGRADATION. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16656/1/fenvs-10-822967.pdf
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03682naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062950
005 2022-09-05
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967$2DOI
100 1 $aGRAHMANN, K.
245 $aSoil use legacy as driving factor for soil erosión under conservation agriculture.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received: 26 November 2021/Accepted: 28 January 2022/Published: 28 February 2022.
520 $aAbstract: Water erosion can cause irreversible depletions in soil quality and crop productivity. The susceptibility of the soil to erosion is affected by current and historical management practices. Historical soil management practices like ploughing or subsoil loosening may lead to irreversible degradations of soils, which in turn increases soil erosion risk. Six ?Wischmeier? plots under conservation agriculture, but with different historic treatments regarding soil use and management, were evaluated. These plots were installed in 1984 in Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay on a Vertic Argiudoll. The objective of this study was to quantify how changes in soil quality, generated by different historical soil use and management over the last 35 years, contribute to current runoff and soil erosion in a cropping system under soil conservation practices using no-till, residue retention and cover crops. Considering differences in soil legacy effects of previous land use, plots were grouped in three treatments with contrasting historic index of agricultural intensification (IAI). The IAI was developed combining the duration of land use under agricultural production and the number and intensity of tillage activity resulting in the treatments: tillage with crop-pasture rotation (TIL_CP), no-tillage under several rotations (NT_Mix) and tillage with continuous cropping (TIL_CROP) with an increasing IAI of 3.5, 7.1 and 11.8, respectively. Rainfall events, runoff water and total, fixed and volatile solids were studied from 2017 to 2019. Soil physical (bulk density, penetration resistance, infiltration rate, aggregate stability), chemical (soil organic carbon (SOC), pH, phosphorous (P-Bray)) and biological properties (particulate organic matter (POM), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN)) were assessed in 2019. Yearly average runoff amounted 209, 579 and 320 mm in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Yearly average soil losses were 233, 805 and 139 kg/ha with significant differences among years. The lowest soil losses were observed in TIL_CP (231, 615 and 146 kg/ha in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) with lowest IAI of 3.5. Infiltration rate was the lowest in plots with highest IAI. Soil bulk density was highest (1.3 g/cm3) in plots with high IAI. SOC and PMN were lowest in TIL_CROP (3.0% SOC and 34 mg/kg PMN), holding the highest IAI of 11.8. Conservation agriculture minimized soil erosion losses in all plots and years, and erosion was much lower than the maximum tolerable threshold of 7,000 kg/ha for this particular soil. However, in historically intensively tilled and cropped soils, soil quality showed long-term adverse effects pointing towards a reduced resilience of the agricultural system.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aINTENSIFICATION INDEX
653 $aLONG-TERM EXPERIMENT
653 $aRUNOFF
653 $aRUSLE
653 $aSEDIMENTS
653 $aSOIL DEDRADATION
653 $aSOIL DEGRADATION
700 1 $aRUBIO, V.
700 1 $aPEREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, A.
773 $tFrontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, volumen 10, article number 822967. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
24/02/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
TSENG, M.C.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
|
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign. Department of Crop Sciences. USA.; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, SAMAN (Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales), Uruguay.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GONZALO ROBERTO ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN PEREYRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign. Department of Crop Sciences. USA / UC Davis. Department of Plant Sciences. USA. |
|
Título : |
Field-level factors for closing yield gaps in high-yielding rice systems of Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Field Crops Research, February 2021, vol. 264, no. 108097. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097 |
|
Páginas : |
12 p. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 9 April 2020 / Received in revised form 12 January 2021 / Accepted 5 February 2021 / Available online 24 February 2021. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Yield gap assessments at the field-level are key for developing management practices to increase crop production in a sustainable manner. Although rice is an important food crop worldwide, yield gaps remain less investigated in Latin American rice systems. In this study, we evaluated field-level factors for closing yield gaps (based on
attainable farm yield, defined as the mean of top 10 % of farmers) for rice production in Uruguay using crop management and yield records from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 70,000 ha per year (40 % of total rice area). The mean annual attainable yield gap ranged from 16 % to 22 % in fields with non-hybrid cultivars (90 %
of planted area) and from 14 % to 22 % in fields with hybrid rice (10 % of planted area). Early seeding was identified as the most influential factor for reducing yield gaps in both systems, followed by N rate. Stand establishment was also important for closing yield gap in non-hybrid fields, while rotation with improved pasture was important in hybrid fields. When variables were categorized as input-related, manageable, or nonmanageable, on average manageable factors (e.g. early planting and stand stablishment) were more important than input-related factors (e.g. seed or fertilizer rate). This study highlights a simple, self-contained method using large field-level datasets to quantify yield gaps and develop strategies for improving agricultural productivity. |
|
Palabras claves : |
CROP MANAGEMENT; RICE; SISTEMA ARROZ-PASTURAS; SOUTH AMERICA; YIELD GAP. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02446naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1061757
005 2021-02-24
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097$2DOI
100 1 $aTSENG, M.C.
245 $aField-level factors for closing yield gaps in high-yielding rice systems of Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a12 p.
500 $aArticle history: Received 9 April 2020 / Received in revised form 12 January 2021 / Accepted 5 February 2021 / Available online 24 February 2021.
520 $aAbstract: Yield gap assessments at the field-level are key for developing management practices to increase crop production in a sustainable manner. Although rice is an important food crop worldwide, yield gaps remain less investigated in Latin American rice systems. In this study, we evaluated field-level factors for closing yield gaps (based on attainable farm yield, defined as the mean of top 10 % of farmers) for rice production in Uruguay using crop management and yield records from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 70,000 ha per year (40 % of total rice area). The mean annual attainable yield gap ranged from 16 % to 22 % in fields with non-hybrid cultivars (90 % of planted area) and from 14 % to 22 % in fields with hybrid rice (10 % of planted area). Early seeding was identified as the most influential factor for reducing yield gaps in both systems, followed by N rate. Stand establishment was also important for closing yield gap in non-hybrid fields, while rotation with improved pasture was important in hybrid fields. When variables were categorized as input-related, manageable, or nonmanageable, on average manageable factors (e.g. early planting and stand stablishment) were more important than input-related factors (e.g. seed or fertilizer rate). This study highlights a simple, self-contained method using large field-level datasets to quantify yield gaps and develop strategies for improving agricultural productivity.
653 $aCROP MANAGEMENT
653 $aRICE
653 $aSISTEMA ARROZ-PASTURAS
653 $aSOUTH AMERICA
653 $aYIELD GAP
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aMACEDO, I.
700 1 $aMARELLA, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.
700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M.
773 $tField Crops Research, February 2021, vol. 264, no. 108097. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
